Copyright © Independent American Party 1998-2008

 

Home

Beliefs

Donate

Join

Candidates and Voting

Committee of Correspondence

Contact

Events

IAP Brochure

Links

Military Matters

Prayer Alerts

Principles, Not Politics

IAP State Organizations

Take Action!

The Wisdom of the Founders

 

 

 

 

National Chairman's Letter

IAP Alive!

November 2004

Dear Independent American friends,

First item: I wish to thank all those good candidates everywhere who placed their time and efforts on the line in the cause for freedom. Presidential candidate Michael Peroutka traveled thousands of miles to deliver his message. Our other federal candidates made numerous appearances. Some of our local candidates spent countless hours campaigning door-to-door. And may I thank all those campaign workers who helped these candidates with their campaigns.

Second item: The Independent American Party endorsed seventeen candidates, and would have endorsed many more if we had had their campaign profiles in time. Here are the election results of most of the candidates we endorsed:

At the federal level: Constitution Party candidates Michael Peroutka for President and Chuck Baldwin for Vice President received 149,027 votes or 0.13% nationally. In Utah, Gary Van Horn for U.S. Senate got 16,151 votes or 1.96%; Jeremy Petersen for U.S. House District #2 got 3,391 or 1.06%; and Ronald Glen Winfield for U.S. House District #3 got 4,795 or 2.06%. Van Horn, Petersen and Winfield are IAP members who ran under the Constitution Party banner.

In local races: In South Dakota, D. Scott Bartlett for Senate #11 received 396 votes or 3.30%. In Utah, Frank Crowther for Senate #24 got 1,158 or 4.30%; Craig Perkes for House #34 got 190 or 1.95%; and Bruce Bangerter for House #44 got 252 or 2.10%. Each of these candidates are IAP members who ran on the Constitution Party ticket.

Three Utah Constitution Party candidates garnered two-digit figures in their races. Douglas K. Thompson for House #54 got 1,641 votes or 14.50%; Edward T. McGarr for House #58 got 1,451 or 21.76%; and Benton L. Peterson for House #68 got 1,298 or 13.5%. Each of these were two-way contests with no Democrat in the race. Peterson is also a member of the IAP.

We endorsed several other candidates: Timothy Raty ran Libertarian for Idaho House #34-A. John Linnehan ran Republican for Maine Senate #28. L. Thomas White ran America First for Massachusetts House #8. And Sandy Williams Collins and Clint A. Deal, Jr. ran Tennessee Independent for Polk County Assessor and Polk County Constable #3, respectively. I don't have the election results for these races. Raty, Collins and Deal are also members of the IAP.

Third item. Now I would like to take a critical look at the outcome of the presidential election. Here are the results for the top six candidates in that race: Republican George W. Bush won with 51.0% of the vote. Democrat John Kerry came in second with 48.0%. Independent Ralph Nader (unaffiliated with any party) came in third with 0.43%. Libertarian Michael Badnarik came in fourth with 0.34%. Constitution candidate Michael Peroutka came in fifth with 0.13%. Green candidate David Cobb came in fifth with 0.05%. All other third party or independent presidential candidates garnered the remaining 0.05% of the vote.

Now I would like to compare how these candidates did against themselves or their counterparts from four years ago with the following table.

2004                                                                   2000                                                           Diff
#1 Bush (Republican)               51.0%            Bush (Republican)            47.9%             +3.31
#2 Kerry (Democrat)                 48.0%            Gore (Democrat)              48.4%              –0.04
#3 Nader (independent)           0.43%            Nader (Green)                   2.69%              –2.26
--                                                  --                     Buchanan (Reform)          0.42%              --
#4 Badnarik (Libertarian)         0.34%            Browne (Libertarian)        0.37%              –0.03
#5 Peroutka (Constitution)       0.13%            Phillips (Constitution)        0.09%             +0.04
#6 Cobb (Green)                       0.09%            Nader (Green)                   2.67%              –2.58
--                                                  --                     Hagelin (Natural Law)       0.08%              --
#7 Other 0.05%                         --                     --                                                                   --

Bush gained 6.9% in percentages points from 2000. Kerry gained only 0.08% from what Gore got in 2000. Gore won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote. Nader dropped 84% in percentage points from what he got before; and this was only partly attributable to the fact that he was on considerably fewer state ballots (34 plus Washington, DC) than he was in 2000.

The Libertarians were on an impressive 48 state ballots plus DC; but Badnarik received 8% less percentage points than Harry Browne did in 2000. The Greens took the biggest hit with Cobb dropping 96% in percentage points from what they got in 2000; though this is mitigated by their having a lesser-known candidate and being on less state ballots (27 plus DC) than before.

The Constitution Party was a bright spot with Peroutka gaining almost half as many more percentage points as Howard Phillips got in 2000. However, this is somewhat abated by the fact that Phillips likely would have gotten a greater percentage if he had not had to share his would-be votes with nearly-philosophically-identical candidate Pat Buchanan. Peroutka was on 36 state ballots whereas Phillips was on 39.

All third party and independent candidates together received about 1.04% of the presidential vote; as compared to 3.70% of the vote in 2000 — a 72% decrease in percentage points.

Fourth item: The National Committee of the Independent American Party met in special session on November 13 (after the election) to decide the future of our party. We had been in political limbo the past eight months after it was determined that we would not be on the ballot in any state. We had encouraged our candidates to run on other party tickets. We had talked informally on the merits of merging with another like-minded party should it do well in the 2004 elections.

However, no third party showed any substantial gain or momentum overall from prior elections. Some of the reasons are lack of a charismatic and well-known candidate, inability to crack the media ceiling, lack of money, inability to mount a credible campaign, and failure to educate and motivate the voters. No third party has yet found the formula for overcoming these things.

After a long discussion of our options, the IAP National Committee (in special session) voted unanimously to forge ahead to build the IAP for the next elections and fight for freedom! The formula for success is out there, and we are committed to find and utilize it. The IAP is alive!

For God, Family and Country!

Bruce Bangerter
IAP National Chairman