Independent American Party

"Freedom is our Heritage and our Destiny"

Copyright © Independent American Party 1998-2009

 

Home

Beliefs

Donate

Join

Candidates and Voting

Committee of Correspondence

Contact

Events

IAP Brochure

Links

Military Matters

Prayer Alerts

Principles, Not Politics

IAP State Organizations

State Party Development

Take Action!

The Wisdom of the Founders

 

 

 

Gambling and the Work Ethic

by Dr. Phil Stringer (Florida)

"Wealth gotten by vanity shall be diminished: but he that gathereth by labour shall increase" (Proverbs 13:11).

"He that tilleth his land shall have plenty of bread: but he that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough. A faithful man shall abound with blessings: but he that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent" (Probers 28:19-20).

* * *

Best-selling author Robert Ringer comments on how governments exploit human weakness by legalizing gambling in his book Million Dollar Habits:

THE SOMETHING-FOR-NOTHING URGE

The something-for-nothing urge is part of the human psyche and based on sheer self-delusion. To one degree or another, we all possess the something-for-nothing urge. It is the urge that has made gambling a national pastime in most countries throughout history. State governments understand this all too well. They have increasingly appealed to the gambling urge to appropriate more dollars from citizens by enticing them into state-sponsored lotteries. Of course, this is in addition to the take that most states skim off the top from wagering at horse and dog tracks, jaialai frontons, and gambling casinos. With such an explicit stamp of approval, it’s little wonder that a recent survey estimated that as many as 4.2 million Americans may be addicted to gambling.

In reality, compulsive gambling is a serious mental illness that endangers both the compulsive gambler and those around him. It involves the ultimate self-delusion -- the belief that something for nothing is possible, which, of course, is a totally false perception of reality and brings about negative results.

The "Protestant Work Ethic" is summed up in II Thessalonians 3:10, "For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat." For a long time in America every government program was expected to support this principle. This became known as the Protestant Work Ethic. As long as this was government policy, reinforced by most of our culture, the American economy was always booming.

However, under our new approach to culture, the Protestant work ethic has come under attack from the government in two basic ways:

• The welfare system and
• Government-sponsored gambling.

Government agencies (usually state governments) spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year to convince citizens that gambling is the way to prosperity.

The only defense ever given for legalized, government-owned or licensed gambling establishments is that they are a supposed financial boon for local communities and county and state governments. But, there are other considerations. The late Senator Estes Kefauver said,

Gambling produces nothing and adds nothing to the economy or society of our nation. Americans will be in a bad way if we ever have to resort to taxing crime and immorality for the purpose of rasing revenue to operate our institutions.

Gambling does not create any wealth; it only redistributes it. And, it usually redistributes it in a way that harms society in general. One study reported that gambling institutions brought in an average income of $4.35 per adult in the community. But a Maryland study indicated that increased crime, increased welfare costs, and dealing with gambling addicts was costing the average adult between $13 and $23 in taxes every year!

The government entity that erodes the Protestant Work Ethic erodes its own income base. People can debate whether or not Christianity is a good idea, but it is those who practice the Christian work ethic that earn taxable income.

One Maryland study showed that one-third of the families with annual incomes of less than $10,000 spend one-fifth of their income on lotteries. And, it was their government who spent millions of dollars convincing them that the lottery was their ticket to the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous."

Government should reward self-reliance, hard work, and initiative. Government should not put itself in the place of putting its stamp of approval on the plans of millionaire developers to take advantage of human weakness. And, it should not directly exploit the weakness of its citizens.

Columnist William Safire said:

Gambling promotion has become a key to state budget-balancing. Card-carrying right-wingers are not supposed to mind taxing the poor, but really soaking the poor -- as this excessively regressive taxation does -- sticks in my craw.

Why? Because it is wrong for the state to exploit the weakness of its citizens. It is the most unfair and painful form of "painless" taxation. The money isn’t coming from a few big bookies and croupiers, but from the pockets of millions.

And gambling taxation feeds on itself. We cannot give up the state income from betting, say legislators who feel guilty about pretending that gambling is good, because the states have become dependent on the money, or because other states will use casinos to lure their tourism. They have become as hooked on gamblings as a source of revenue as any compulsive gambler betting the milk money.

Dr. Phil Stringer is Executive Vice President of Landmark Baptist College, Haines City, Florida.